Judge reserves decision on CWB directors' request

Lifting Wheat Board law would sow confusion: federal lawyer

Jan 19, 2012 1:46 PM - 4 comments
TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text

By: Rod Nickel
Winnipeg | Reuters

Suspending a new law that ended the Canadian Wheat Board's monopoly would sow confusion in Western Canada's grain industry, lawyers for the federal government said in court on Wednesday in a hearing on a plea from eight former directors.

The onetime CWB directors, Prairie farmers ousted when the bill to revamp the CWB became law last month, want a Manitoba judge to suspend the law until the court decides its validity.

Judge Shane Perlmutter of Court of Queen's Bench in Winnipeg reserved his decision until an unspecified date.

Government lawyer Robert MacKinnon said such a ruling would create uneven marketing conditions between Manitoba -- where it would immediately take effect -- and other Prairie provinces, and would undermine contracts that some farmers and grain companies have already signed.

Canada is the world's biggest exporter of spring wheat, durum and malting barley, and legal challenges have already created confusion as farmers price out their crop options for spring planting.

"The uncertainty that has been created was created by the (legal) action itself," MacKinnon told the judge. "An injunction doesn't dispel the uncertainty."

"Single grain"

The former directors' case leans heavily on a Federal Court ruling in December that said Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz breached existing law by not consulting the Wheat Board or holding a farmer vote before introducing the legislation.

They say that ruling raises questions about whether the new law is valid, so it must be suspended until a court can rule on its validity.

The government lawyers said the ex-directors are exaggerating the significance of the Federal Court's ruling, which specified that it did not affect the legislation.

"You cannot make a brick out of a single grain of sand," MacKinnon said.

Farmers in Western Canada have been required since 1943 to sell wheat and barley for milling or export via the CWB. The new law, which takes effect in August, lets farmers sell to whomever they choose. But grain handlers, millers and farmers are already signing contracts to deliver crops after the monopoly is gone.

In mid-December, the same Manitoba judge rejected the farmers' request for an immediate suspension of the law but set this hearing to hear lawyers' arguments.

The former directors say their case is pressing because farmers and grain companies are making deals under a law that may not be valid.

"The legislation will bring irreparable change to the Canadian Wheat Board and the change will harm not only (the ex-directors), but producers across Canada," said the former directors' lawyer, Colin MacArthur.

"All producers have been disenfranchised improperly because of the refusal of the minister to do what he was statutorily required to do."



Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

Joyce Neufeld

I don't know what the open marketers are bellyaching about. They could always sell their own grain - just not for less than the CWB could sell for. Besides they are not marketing their own grain they are not even selling it - all they do is go to one of the grain corporations and sell at their price, their time scheduel and even their elevator/terminal point - talk about intelligence???

Posted January 24, 2012 11:48 PM


Blair Shilka

I for one, want the OPTION to sell, to whom ever wants to do business with me, directly. Those who wish to pool market their grain still have that option, through the CWB, and perhaps Cargill as well. The farmer survey taken by the CWB did not include me, as I understand, because I did not sell wheat or barley to them the previous year. I have grain farmed in Alberta since 1975, haven't taken a sobatical from it, have grown wheat and barley, still grain farm, and intend to continue. To the fellows leading the charge against freedom to market, I respectfully say, please stop. Blair Shilka Worsley, Alberta, Canada.

Posted January 20, 2012 03:31 PM


richard

In the end--whether you are for or against what the gov't did---they make the laws---they have a majority in parliament and it matters not if the farmers are for or against the new law---right or wrong--all the farmers can do in the end is vote for against them in the next election--no judge can stop this train--so why waste time---the farmers who wanted to give up the monopoly ---something most businesses would kill for--won the day--the problem was not the CWB--but how it was run--and in the end--ultimatly the Board was responsible--past and present ones--

Posted January 20, 2012 01:53 PM


Rosetta Lang

I have been silent too long...listening to my husband and neighbours complain about the wheat board monopoly yet never writing an article to say why! Who else would work, pay in expensive and then be told you can only sell part of your product and only when we call for it...oh yes you will only be paid a portion at a time of your salary as we see fit....and that may take up to 16 months!!! The farmers thought they had spoken when they voted in director Rod Flaman as he was opposed to the CWB....he changed his mind and became pro CWB was that tactics? Where did that leave all of us who voted him and others in? One person said getting a interm payment was like finding extra money...NOOOOOO your bills were waitng way back there to be paid not 5 - 10 or longer months down the road. The urban people hear that the farmers are getting so many millon in after payments but have no idea that money was and is rightfully ours from day one to pay costs that can't wait The Rural Municipalities tell us to have our grain accessible to haul out when the winter weights are on....however we are at the beck and call of the CWB and only get contract calls 25% at a time. It costs more to haul partial loads in spring and at the risk of soft roads. There I have vented....enough let the government's law to disband the CWB become law.

Posted January 20, 2012 09:52 AM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Alberta Farm Express has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields