New fishery laws to exempt irrigation, field drainage

Apr 25, 2012 4:22 AM - 6 comments
TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text

By: Staff

Federal rules governing irrigation channels, drainage ditches and field drains are expected to be loosened as the government moves to draw a new legal line between fish habitat and other bodies of water.

Federal Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield on Tuesday announced the government's plans to amend the Fisheries Act and related policy that currently governs "all bodies of water where fish live -- or could live."

Under the current regulatory regime, the government said, water bodies such as drainage ditches, man-made reservoirs and irrigation channels are indiscriminately subject to the same rules and guidelines as rivers, lakes, and oceans that support fish and local fisheries.

"That does not make sense to us, and frankly we don't think it makes sense to the majority of Canadians," Ashfield said.

The government, he said, has heard of "farmers being prevented from cleaning out their irrigation channels, municipalities being delayed in repairing bridge supports and routine maintenance of drainage ditches, businesses not being allowed to clear flooded fields and campsites, and cottage owners prohibited from keeping up their properties -- all because of the existing rules."

From the perspective of landowners and municipalities, the proposed new measures are expected to provide "regulatory certainty as to whether and how the fisheries protection provisions apply to them," the government said.

The new regulatory regime is expected to move Fisheries and Oceans Canada "away from reviewing every activity that landowners may undertake."

Rather, the government said, its proposed changes are expected to focus the department's protection efforts on recreational, commercial and Aboriginal fisheries and will draw a legal distinction between "vital waterways that support Canada's fisheries, and unproductive bodies of water."

The amendments and policy changes, the government said, will focus on identifying and managing "real threats to the fisheries, including direct impacts to fish, habitat destruction, and aquatic invasive species."

The rules are also expected to give a federal fisheries minister the tools to establish "new, clear and accessible guidelines for Canadians to follow for projects in or near water."

For example, the government said, "regulatory standards for routine, low-risk projects such as building a boat launch or a dock at the cottage do not exist at this time."

The new rules are also expected to allow the fisheries ministry to "identify ecologically sensitive areas that require enhanced protection," as opposed to the current regulatory regime, in which "all areas are treated indiscriminately under the law."

"Oversight"

The government emphasized that waterways "will continue to be protected from pollution as they have in the past" and that its planned changes "would provide additional clarity around the management of deleterious substances."

Ashfield, over the "coming weeks and months," is expected to consult with the provinces, Aboriginal groups and stakeholders such as conservation groups, anglers, landowners and municipalities to develop the new regulatory and policy framework.

The federal New Democrats on Tuesday ripped the government's proposals, warning the changes could "seriously weaken environmental oversights in the context of major development projects, such as those involving oil and gas."

"Weakening provisions to protect fish habitat will also weaken environmental reviews," Fin Donnelly, the NDP's deputy fisheries critic for the West Coast, said in a release.

Such proposals, he said, would make it "easier for the Conservatives to fast-track projects like pipelines without strong environmental oversight."

"The Conservatives are demonstrating that the long-term survival of the ecosystems that support the fisheries is not important to them," Phil Toone, deputy NDP fisheries critic for the East Coast, said in the same release.

Photos

Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield (left, with Ottawa-area MP Pierre Poilievre), speaking Tuesday at Chapman Mills Conservation Area in Ottawa, announced plans to change federal fishery policy. (Fisheries and Oceans Canada photo)
Larger photo & full caption

File size: 36.3 KB (470px X 279px)
Caption: Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield (left, with Ottawa-ar...


Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

inaccurate

"For example, the government said, "regulatory standards for routine, low-risk projects such as building a boat launch or a dock at the cottage do not exist at this time."

If you google DFO Operational Statements- the streamlining tools already exist where this article says they don't. There are almost 20 types of works that have set criteria and you never have to talk to DFO....


I know in Ontario- they already have streamlining tools that also deal with agricultural drains (more or less the criteria is set out- you get a copy from a local conservation authority and go about your merry way doing your work without having to talk to DFO). Doesn't this exist in the prairies? can't the same system be adopted?

Posted April 26, 2012 03:46 PM


Lloyd Arnold

This is very welcomed news for us in SW Ontario where the importance of "drainage" to successful farming is like the value of "location" is to successful real estate.
However this has always been a troubling issue for me, even from my young days as a 4-H member learning about drainage and its enormous benefits.Loosening federal rules on something that was never granted is mind boggling.
Under the division of powers made by the British North America Act, the fields of property rights and civil rights became the legislative responsibility of the provinces. This authority includes the law relating to land drainage.
There are, however, some exceptions. Section 92 of the BNA provides that the works and undertakings which extend beyond the borders of one province, and certain works declared to be for " the general benefit of Canada" fall under exclusive Federal jurisdiction.
They include Bell Canada, National Pipe Lines, National Railways, and Indian lands, which are not under the control of the provincial legislatures except to the extent provided in the Federal legislation.
This will provide much needed direction so that the efficient agriculture community can continue to provide raw food sources at one of the lowest levels in the world pertaining to percentage of gross income.
Again, this is so very good news to one of Canada's oldest industries now facing a severe shortage of new entrants at the primary production level. Service providers to our industry are still able to attract new employees of varying skill sets, but we still must concentrate in providing new young farmers with the best tools that we can for their future success. Retiring farmers have been excellent stewards to the industry, but as the torch is passed forward, a major re-think to primary agriculture is MANDATORY !!! No other major industry,(like the automotive industry for one example) would expect additional spousal income or personal off-site income to be required to make an industry viable. If this was the case, imagine what the price of cars would be now, instead of at present levels.
Even elected officials at both levels of government would find it distasteful to have to find supplementary income to survive as a politician,let alone the aspect of no pension at retirement or election loss.
All the best to the Canadian farmers for a successful 2012 growing season.
Lloyd Arnold
R R 6 Dresden



Posted April 26, 2012 01:02 AM


Paul Courey

So there is a God after all. Seeing the havoc wreaked by years of inane/insane bureaucratic bungling and secret agendas on everyday maintenance of essential infrastructure, I had nearly given up hope.

For all the fearmongers out there, remember that all that is being done is to leave the regulatory systems to provincial and local governments where it was duplicated anyway.

Does Ottawa need to care about a ditch that only exists as potential fish habitat because I dug it?

Posted April 25, 2012 06:33 PM


Kevin Marriott

Finally some COMMON SENSE!!! As a farmer and Mayor of a Municipality the ridiculous rules of the past put unnecessary restrictions on cleaning our drainage ditches that had no fish in them at all. Of course the NDP oppossed it for the sake of opposing. Lets hope the NDP never form the Federal Government or we will have more of the kind of stupid laws that put undue hardship on farmers.

Posted April 25, 2012 08:48 AM


Neil F.

The government will draw " and will draw a legal distinction between "vital waterways that support Canada's fisheries, and unproductive bodies of water."

The only water body that I can think of that is unproductive are polluted water bodies as in the 'TAR SANDS'. All other water bodies support aquatic life at some level, or the beginnings of that life.

Posted April 25, 2012 08:08 AM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Alberta Farm Express has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields