Grain commission fees poised to jump 44 per cent

User pay Despite shaving $20 million in costs, the CGC proposes 
big increase in fees so Ottawa no longer has to pay the bill

Reading Time: 3 minutes

In its government-ordered drive to cost recovery, the Canadian Grain Commission (CGC) wants the grain industry to pay an extra $16.7 million a year in user fees effective Aug. 2013.

That’s a 44 per cent increase amounting to an extra $1.38 a tonne on total CGC-inspected Canadian grain exports.

Some fees will skyrocket. For example, the CGC would charge $149.99 for outward inspection per rail car, truck or container — a whopping fivefold jump from the current charge of $29.

The CGC’s outward inspection fee for ships will rise 58 per cent to $1.60 a tonne from the current 51 cents.

The CGC will charge $46.99 to grade a grain sample versus the $15.10 to $24.47 it charges now.

Producer car application fees will increase 33 per cent to $26.50 compared to the $20 farmers pay now.

Citizens have until Nov. 30 to submit written responses to the CGC about the new fees, which are outlined in the CGC’s 54-page User Fees Consultation and Pre-proposal Notification.

More cost reductions needed

The CGC should make more services optional to reduce operating costs, said Wade Sobkowich, executive director of the Western Grain Elevator Association (WGEA). The association also says the federal government should cover the cost of CGC services, which benefit the nation.

Currently Ottawa contributes $5.45 million to CGC services identified as for the public good. The plan is to keep it the same.

If the CGC’s proposed user fees are implemented, the grain sector will cover 91 per cent of the CGC’s budget and the federal government the remaining nine per cent. Right now it’s split 50-50 between the government and the industry.

The fee increase could have been worse, according to the CGC. Amendments to the Canada Grain Act contained in the government’s omnibus Bill C-45, will cut CGC operating costs by $20 million. Initially the grain sector faced a doubling of CGC fees. Making CGC inward grain inspection at terminals and transfer elevators optional, and other changes, will reduce costs.

The CGC says its new fees will amount to about $1.82 a tonne or just 1.9 and 2.2 per cent of the total cost of handling and transporting grain from the middle of the Prairies to Vancouver or St. Lawrence ports, respectively. Without changes CGC services would have cost around $3.07 a tonne.

“We found that our proposed fees appear to be low relative to maximum elevator tariffs,” the CGC states in its consultation document. “Because our fees are low relative to these elevator tariffs, the impact of our fees should have a lower impact than the fees for elevator services.”

Grain quality leader

The CGC says the services it will continue to charge for are critical to maintaining “Canada’s reputation as a leader in grain quality.”

The WGEA says the following CGC services are for the public good and the government should cover the costs: Grain Research Laboratory, the grain quality assurance system, maintaining grain quality standards, food safety activities, policy development, traceability and monitoring, producer security and other overhead costs.

The WGEA says industry users should only pay for producer car administration, subject to grade and dockage adjudication, elevator licensing and accreditation and certification of third parties to provide inspection services.

“For the remainder of CGC functions competitive alternatives must be allowed,” the WGEA says in a position paper.

The WGEA also questions whether the CGC has the legal authority to charge fees for many of its services, Sobkowich said. The User Fee Act only allows fees to be charged where the service “results in a direct benefit or advantage to the person paying the fee.”

The CGC document says its proposed user fees are consistent with those charged for similar services in the United States and Australia. However, the paper also says in 2011 the U.S. government covered 37 per cent of inspection fees with user fees covering the rest. If the CGC’s new fees are implemented the Canadian grain industry will cover 91 per cent of the bill. That puts Canada’s grain industry at a competitive disadvantage, Sobkowich said.

The WGEA is also disappointed the House of Commons agriculture committee has rejected the association’s request to appear to state its position.

“I would think the largest user of CGC services should have a voice at the table, even if it’s only for a few minutes,” he said.

How to make views known on proposed new CGC user fee

Citizens have until Nov. 30 to submit, in writing, their views on the Canadian Grain Commission’s proposed new user fees.

The CGC’s User Fees Consultation and Pre-proposal Notification document is available on the website at (See page 39, Annex 2, Table 6, for a list of the CGC’s current fees and proposed new fees, shown above).

Email submissions to: [email protected]

Mail submissions to: User Fees Comments, Canadian Grain Commission, 600-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Man. R3C 3G8. Include a return address.

Those dissatisfied with the CGC’s response to submissions can take their case before an independent advisory panel. The CGC and the complainant each select a panellist. Those two panellists then select a third independent panellist.

The deadline for requesting a panel is Dec. 30, 2012.

About the author



Stories from our other publications