Wheat board rolls out first details of farmer contracts

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Canadian Wheat Board staff are meeting with farmers across the Prairies to explain how the CWB will work with them after the monopoly ends Aug. 1.

The wheat board will offer pools that cover most of the crop year, similar to those offered in the past, as well as shorter pools and cash and deferred sales contracts, Dave Simonot, the board’s director of Farm Services, told a meeting here.

The board expects many farmers will still want to pool, Simonot said.

“Everyone knows no one gets the top of the market regularly,” he said. “No one does it consistently. In fact the majority of people don’t even achieve the average.

“So the pool provides the opportunity to achieve the average with a low-stress, low-cost approach to marketing.”

Selling through the board also doesn’t tie farmers down to delivering to one grain company.

“We think that’s an advantage in that it keeps some flexibility on your side and puts you in a little bit better negotiating position and hopefully results in a better outcome,” he said.

Grade risk

No matter which middleman farmers use, they need to understand the contracts they sign, Simonot said. When selling grain before harvest, there’s a risk farmers won’t be able to deliver the grade they contracted.

“That will be a significant risk that farmers will be taking on by contracting early,” he said. “We won’t have the flexibility we had in the past when we got all the grain anyway.”

Elevation charges will vary throughout the year, he said. Farmers will pay more at times when the system is being flooded and less when less grain is coming in such as during spring seeding.

The wheat board wants its handling agreements to ensure that when farmers sell through the board they pay the same as other farmers delivering to the same elevator on the same day, Simonot said.

Under the monopoly the wheat board returned all its revenues from grain sales to farmers, less expenses. Although in an open market the board will be a for-profit company and retain earnings, it will charge farmers a per-tonne fee for marketing, he said. The more grain the board markets, the stronger its ability to bargain with the grain handlers. The board’s success depends on how much grain it handles.

“If it turns out to be very large, then the wheat board will have a good future,” Simonot said. “If it doesn’t turn out to be very large the wheat board will have a hard time scrambling because we’ll then have to compete head to head with the existing companies that have all their facilities in place and we’d be at a disadvantage in that game.”

No matter which way it goes, the board’s future is already mapped out in legislation. By no later than 2016 it will either be privatized or wound down.

About the author



Stories from our other publications