Eight all-time records for heat, only one for cold

Reading Time: 3 minutes

As we slowly make our way into 2012, I thought we should take a little bit of time to look back at how 2011 turned out globally. I’ve already mentioned that the last half of 2011 saw our region of the world see record-warm temperatures along with very dry conditions. Globally the Earth in 2011 came in tied with 1997 as the 11th-warmest year since reliable record-keeping began in 1880, according to the U.S. NOAA National Climate Data Center.

Its counterparts at NASA rated 2011 as the ninth warmest on land and the eighth warmest over the oceans. If we look only at the high latitudes (those regions above 64 degrees N), 2011 was the warmest year ever recorded. While we were dry during the second half of 2011, the world as a whole saw the second-wettest year on record, only being beaten out by 2010.

If we look at the all-time extreme heat and cold records set across the globe in 2011, we find eight all-time records for extreme heat and only one record for all-time extreme cold. Zambia recorded an all-time record high of 42.8 C on Oct. 26, which interestingly came only four months after that same country set and all-time extreme cold record of -9 C. This all-time cold record was the first time this type of record has been broken since 2009.

The year 2011 saw a fairly strong La Niña event over the Pacific Ocean. This event brings large amounts of cold water to the surface of the ocean (remember the Pacific Ocean covers about half the surface of the Earth). This cold water helps to cool global temperatures by around 0.2 C. So the fact that 2011 turned out to be so warm is a little surprising. Looking back at previous La Niña years, 2011 turned out to be the warmest La Niña year ever recorded.

Natural causes?

There has been a bunch of talk lately about natural causes that are contributing to these warm temperatures. A recent study by Grant Foster and Stefan Rahmstorf titled Global Temperature Evolution 1979-2010 took a look at five major global temperature datasets and then tried to adjust them to account for the three main natural drivers of global temperatures: El Niño/La Niña, volcanic dust, and changes in sunlight. They found that while these features can have year-to-year effects on temperatures, they had little to no effect on global temperatures over the long term. That is, natural causes of global warming had little to do with the observed increase in global temperatures over the last 33 years. So they concluded that the observed global warming is the result of human activity, some unknown natural source, or some combination of the two.

Could there be some unknown natural cause for the current warming we have been experiencing? The simple answer is that there could be. Ideas have been bantered around such as that a decrease in cloud-producing cosmic rays, or that the increase in carbon dioxide will help produce more clouds, will in turn reduce the effects of the heat-trapping gas. Currently publishing climate scientists don’t support these theories. There is also a lot of talk in the media and by the public in general that there is no consensus among climate scientists as to the impact human activity is having on our climate. In a poll conducted in 2008, around 97 per cent of actively publishing climate scientists answered “yes” to the question, “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?”

Disinformation

For the public to fully understand what is going on, a couple of things have to happen. First, we need to continue to learn more about the weather and climate. As most of us know, if you do not have the knowledge to fully understand a topic it becomes easy for others to use disinformation to try to cast doubt on it. This method of trying to mislead the public was first used by the tobacco industry back in 1960s to try to keep the public smoking by questioning the research linking smoking to health problems. This worked so well that we see this same strategy being used today with global warming.

I’m not saying that we shouldn’t have scientists who are skeptical and try to challenge the current thinking. After all, that is how the scientific process works. We can’t though, just sit back and wait while different ideas are tossed out about global warming that may or may not dramatically change our current understanding of the Earth and the climate system. After all, dramatic changes like this don’t happen very often.

I’ll conclude with a quote from Dr. Ricky Rood.

“Given that greenhouse gases are well known to hold energy close to the Earth, those who deny a human-caused impact on weather need to pose a viable mechanism of how the Earth can hold in more energy and the weather not be changed. Think about it.”

About the author

AF Contributor

Daniel Bezte

Daniel Bezte is a teacher by profession with a BA (Hon.) in geography, specializing in climatology, from the University of Winnipeg. He operates a computerized weather station near Birds Hill Park, Manitoba.

Comments

explore

Stories from our other publications