The bottom line on grain storage

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: September 25, 2014

, , ,

The bottom line on grain storage

AARD Release / Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development has a pair of new fact sheets on the pros and cons of various grain storage options.

“With record crop yields and transport delays of 2013, came greater interest of on-farm storage options,” said Jennifer Stoby, provincial market analyst for agriculture inputs.

“Choosing the right grain storage system can be difficult. But by looking at total costs, the farm’s future plans, existing systems, and labour availability, producers can narrow down the best option for their operation.”

Read Also

Faba beans are an emerging food ingredient and are agronomically suited to the northern Prairie region. However, the price being offered to producers doesn’t compete with other crops.

New crop insurer policy enables easier startup for faba beans

Agriculture Financial Services Corporation updated its normals for faba beans, which may open the door for more Canadian producers to feel comfortable growing the pulse crop in the future.

The two new fact sheets are Grain Storage: Cost Comparisons and Grain Storage Considerations.

They detail many different storage options available, both temporary and permanent.

“The two most popular options are steel grain bins (either corrugated or smooth walled with or without hoppers) and grain bags,” said Stoby. “Other options are sheds, producer-owned grain elevators, grain rings, piles, and bunkers.”

Grain baggers are useful in situations when:

  •  Land is either rented or leased and investment in permanent storage is not desired;
  •  Short-term storage is needed;
  •  The operator plans to exit the business in a few years;
  •  Labour and trucking availability is limited during harvest;
  •  Fields are located long distances apart;
  •  Storing low-quality crops such as feed wheat, barley and sample canola;
  •  Grain doesn’t need to be dried or aerated;
  •  There is plastic recycling in the area;
  •  There is a need to store large volumes of grain.

“Having developed an example cost comparison of bins and baggers, it was found that operations need to store more than 70,000 bushels of grain per year to make the bagger more competitive than bins,” said Stoby. “This was based on a set of assumptions that can be viewed in the Grain Storage: Cost Comparisons fact sheet.”

Baggers are not as easy as they seem, said Stoby.

“Since they only provide temporary storage, grain should only be stored for six to eight months. There is also potential for damage to the plastic from wildlife, trees or human activities such as snowmobiling. Once the bag is exposed to the elements grain spoilage and pest and wildlife damage can occur. Recycling options are also limited and some municipalities may not take the waste plastic.”

explore

Stories from our other publications