Whole Foods wins dismissal of PETA lawsuit over meat claims

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: April 27, 2016

,

(Stephen Ausmus photo courtesy ARS/USDA)

Reuters — Whole Foods Market won the dismissal of a lawsuit by a well-known animal rights group that accused the grocery chain of deceiving consumers into believing the meat it sells is raised more humanely than normal, resulting in overcharges.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) said the use by Whole Foods of a five-step rating system for beef, chicken, pork and turkey was a “sham,” because it was not enforced against suppliers, and the standards were at best little better than normal industry practices.

Read Also

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi shake hands before posing for a photo during the G7 Leaders’ Summit in Kananaskis, in Alberta, Canada, June 17, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Amber Bracken

India and Canada to begin free trade talks during Carney’s visit, minister says

India hopes to start talks on a free trade agreement with Canada during Prime Minister Mark Carney’s visit to India later this week, the South Asian nation’s trade minister said on Tuesday.

In a decision late Tuesday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins in San Jose, California said PETA failed to show that Whole Foods’ alleged misrepresentations on in-store signs, placards and napkins defrauded consumers into overpaying.

Cousins said statements such as “great-tasting meat from healthy animals” and “raised right tastes right” amounted to permissible “puffery” by the Austin, Texas-based company.

He also said the statement that “no cages” were used to raise broiler chickens was not misleading merely because Whole Foods failed to also disclose that poultry suppliers normally do not use cages in the first place.

“Retailers do not have a duty to disclose product information unless it relates to a consumer safety issue,” and PETA did not raise any such issues, Cousins wrote.

The lawsuit was brought by PETA and Lori Grass of Portola Valley, California, a town south of San Francisco. It sought class-action status for California consumers who bought Whole Foods meat products over four years.

“There is still no question that Whole Foods is misleading well-meaning shoppers into buying meat falsely labeled ‘humane,'” PETA said in a statement. “This is a developing area of the law, and we are considering how we want to proceed.”

Whole Foods did not immediately respond on Wednesday to requests for comment.

Reporting for Reuters by Jonathan Stempel in New York.

explore

Stories from our other publications