Supply Management Groups Want More Input

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: October 26, 2009

The Canadian Federation of Agriculture and supply-managed commodity groups say farmers have had no input on a revised interprovincial trade deal that carries a potential downside for the ag sector.

“The initiative to renegotiate the text was without any prior consultation with affected industry groups,” CFA president Laurent Pellerin said in a release.

The revisions to Chapter Nine of the provinces’ Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT) have effects for “every sector of Canadian agriculture,” he said.

The CFA said its legal analysis of the text shows that “despite the (provincial) premiers’ assurances that the legislative powers of orderly marketing boards has been excluded, the actual language is not adequate. In addition, further legal analysis has shown the text does not specifically protect the power for ministerial exemptions.”

Read Also

Cows, accompanied by their calves, graze pasture in a rotational grazing system, summer 2018. Photo: Alexis Stockford

Grazing ‘sweet spot’ boosts pasture performance

Timing-focused approach to pasture management touted to boost forage growth, livestock gains while also cutting farmer labour and inputs

The federation and its provincial members have been asking for consultations and language to protect supply management and marketing boards, and have also proposed that the wording and intention related to the protection and maintenance of supply management needs to reflect what was agreed to in the Trade and Co-operation Agreement between Quebec and Ontario.

The provincial governments had committed to consult with farmers and industries but “they did not follow up,” Canada’s supply-managed poultry, egg and dairy commodity groups – commonly referred to as the “SM5” – said in a joint release.

About the author

Alberta Farmer Staff

Staff

explore

Stories from our other publications