Glacier FarmMedia – I’m not the one to come up with the line used in this article’s headline, but I wish I was. It is a succinct way of describing one of the most challenging policy aspects of sustainability.
It is difficult, even impossible, to change farming practices aimed at improving environmental sustainability when experiencing negative margins. That idea applies to every kind of business.
Even though this seems obvious, it is not always recognized by governments. Governments’ most frequent policy tool is regulation. Imposing costly restrictions and penalties on businesses is often the default action.
Read Also
Farm equipment sales sector sees significant structural changes
Farming equipment sales have been declining for a number of years now, and one industry professional believes structural changes in the industry are needed to curb that trend.
That shouldn’t be the case.
Take the carbon tax, for example. The stated policy objective is to reduce carbon emissions by discouraging the use of fossil fuels. This may work when the use of fossil fuels is a discretionary expense, but heating a hog barn in winter is not discretionary.
For hog farmers, energy costs are the second-highest operating expense after feed. At a time when farmers’ margins are written in red ink, the carbon tax is making it more expensive to raise pigs.
This is antithetical to the policy objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, because farmers are more likely to take on innovative business practices when their operation is profitable. The carbon tax has become a barrier to adoption of innovation that could improve environmental sustainability.
The carbon tax is also making Canadian hog farmers less competitive internationally. Manitoba exports 90 per cent of the pigs raised in the province every year, either as live animals bound for the United States or as packages of pork exported around the world.
Canadian farmers are competing against producers in other countries who do not face the added cost of the carbon tax. The reduction in our competitiveness impacts jobs in both urban and rural areas, which in Manitoba equals 22,000 jobs across the province, and discourages investment in every link of the industry’s value chain.
To summarize, when applied to the energy requirements for raising pigs, the carbon tax does not achieve its policy goals and it inhibits the adoption of alternative business practices that may improve sustainability, all while decreasing the competitiveness of Canadian farmers in world markets.
The cost and ineffectiveness of the carbon tax when applied to farming operations was recognized by the member of parliament who introduced bill C-234, “An Act to Amend the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act.” This legislation, which was supported by a majority of MPs, would remove the carbon tax from essential agricultural operations like heating a barn in winter.
Unfortunately, the Senate disagreed and amended the legislation, removing the reference to barn heating.
How much will this change cost Canadian farmers? The Parliamentary Budget Office estimates this cost to be $910 million annually.
There is a better way. Not all government policy objectives need to be met using a regulatory hammer, as is being done with the carbon tax. Instead, governments should be adopting an incentive-based approach. The alternative policy approach is one rooted in collaboration with farmers and accepting that financial sustainability for producers must be at the foundation of any strategy.
The collaborative approach may not appear to be the easy path for those who are charged with implementing government policy.
Canada is a large, diverse country and innovative practices that drive fiscal and environmental sustainability in Quebec or the Maritimes or British Columbia may not work on the Prairies. The approach must have enough flexibility to account for differences in climate, soils and ecosystems across Canada.
Provincial and local governments need to be engaged when determining which new practices and technology will work in a specific region.
While this may sound messy and complicated when compared to a one-size-fits-all regulation, in the long run, it is incentives and collaboration, instead of costly regulations, that will deliver meaningful results.
The federal carbon tax is set to increase again on April 1. If this happens, Canadian farmers will be a little less competitive internationally and see a little bit more red ink on the bottom line. It does not have to be this way.
– Cam Dahl is the general manager of the Manitoba Pork Council, which represents that province’s pork producers.
