Sometimes deciding what to feed the family after a long, arduous day juggling daycare, jobs, and traffic seems overwhelmingly complicated.
If a recent press release from the U.S.-based Tyson Innovation Lab is any indication, deciding what we’re going to put into our mouths next is about to get more cluttered with new products, new language, and new pressure to think about how we feel about food.
In launching its new brand, ¡Yappah!, this two-pager bombards the reader with lingo such as “upcycling” and “rescued ingredients.” It makes the case that by supporting this brand, consumers can address “major social and sustainability challenges related to food.”
Read Also
Farm equipment sales sector sees significant structural changes
Farming equipment sales have been declining for a number of years now, and one industry professional believes structural changes in the industry are needed to curb that trend.
It launched its first product called Protein Crisps on the Indiegogo crowdfunding platform so we can all chip in and help the world’s second-largest meat processor fight food waste. As of mid-June, it had raised just over US$5,000 from more than 250 backers.
Tyson says the name was inspired by a South American Andes tradition called “‘yapa,’ which refers to the little something extra a merchant gives to a valued customer so that nothing gets wasted.”
“The ¡Yappah! brand mission is unique, important and far reaching,” Rizal Hamdallah, head of Tyson Innovation Lab, said in the release. “The brand was created to inspire people and partners to rethink their relationship to food and how it impacts society. Through this launch, we intend to address global food challenges such as food waste.”
Protein Crisps are a cracker-like snack manufactured from “upcycled chicken breast trim that is still full of flavour and protein.”
Makers combined the itty-bitty pieces left over from making chicken tenders with “rescued” vegetable purée, (the mash that is left over from juicing) and what’s left of the barley used in brewing Molson Coors beer. The product is sold in a fully recyclable aluminum can.
No doubt, these ingredients contain useful nutrition and food waste is a big issue. However, repurposing leftovers to reduce waste is nothing new in kitchens around the world. In the old days, we called it “soup” and “casseroles.”
This is just the latest example of how food industry is fragmenting as manufacturers look for new ways to attract customers beyond the usual attributes such as price, taste and nutritional value.
In this case, Tyson is taking the scraps from one set of highly processed foods and creating another. And if the ‘yum’ factor isn’t enough to sell it, feeling morally superior while snacking just might.
A recently released Dalhousie University survey on consumer attitudes toward labelling of foods made from genetically modified ingredients lists 12 specific factors driving consumer purchases. Respondents were asked to choose up to three considerations.
“Price is still dominant but other factors are also becoming more of an issue,” said lead author Sylvain Charlebois.
The message in this for farmers is mixed. Unless they are selling directly to consumers, farmers supply ingredients. The Tyson effort to differentiate or add value to leftovers doesn’t influence how those ingredients are produced.
However, in a remarkably different approach, Maple Leaf Meats in Canada conducted extensive surveys of its own before reconfiguring many of its product recipes to go ‘au naturel.’
The “manifesto” on its website promises no artificial preservatives, flavours, colours, sweeteners, or animal byproducts. Instead of the usual hard-to-pronounce ingredients listed on most processed meat labels, it has turned to ingredients such as cultured celery extract, dried garlic, honey, lemon juice concentrate, and rosemary extract.
Its promise to customers also includes a commitment to enhancing animal wellness practices according to the Five Freedoms, the most widely accepted global standard for animal care, and to minimizing the environmental impacts.
That does have implications for how farmers operate. The challenge is ensuring producers who supply into that value chain capture a share of the added value.
Both companies are hoping to cash in on the ‘feel good’ trends in consumer choices.
But if I was betting money, I like the odds on Maple Leaf’s approach.
Consumers may be willing to think as they shop, but when they sit down to eat at the end of the day, the feel good factor is about how it sits with their stomach, not their conscience.
